The Adaptability Paradox
Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience
The Adaptability Paradox
Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience
Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations?
Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In The Adaptability Paradox, political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation.
Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures.
Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.
320 pages | 6 x 9 | © 2025
Chicago Studies in American Politics
Law and Legal Studies: Law and Society, The Constitution and the Courts
Political Science: American Government and Politics
Reviews
Table of Contents
I. How Adaptable Is the American Constitution?
2. Rudiments and Range
3. Consistency in Adaptation
4. The Adaptability Paradox
2. A Party State
3. “Reconstruction”
4. An Administrative State
2. Rights and Structure
3. Party and Administration
4. The Dubious Power of Separation
5. Principles Without Ballast
2. The “New Class” and the “Neo-Conservatives”
3. The Lawyers
4. Is Adaptation Still Possible?
Index
Be the first to know
Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!