“In Between History and Myth, Lincoln gives a cogent analysis of medieval Icelandic and Norwegian responses to the myth of the founding of the Norwegian state, transmitted in accounts of Harald Fairhair’s accession to the throne of Norway. While the Norwegian responses emerge as predominantly favorable, the Icelandic ones are negative by comparison. Midway between these two approaches stands Heimskringla, an encyclopedic history of the Norwegian kings attributed to the Icelander Snorri Sturluson (d. 1241), whose relationship with Norway was profoundly ambivalent. With a subtlety worthy of Snorri himself, Lincoln exposes the cunning ambiguity with which Heimskringla, drawing on motifs of Old Norse mythology, presents Harald’s accession as both a glorious event and a disaster, thus functioning as revisionist history in the guise of official history. With its original and fascinating argument, Lincoln’s book will appeal to a general readership as well as to specialists in many fields.”

Rory McTurk, University of Leeds

“Lincoln, a past master of comparative mythology and religion, of semiotics and various expressions of structuralism, here applies his unrivaled skills to a new field, the colorful story of the founding of the Norwegian state in the ninth century. The result is a book that will reshape parts of Old Norse–Icelandic studies and become a classic text in that discipline, but Between History and Myth is so well crafted that it will give pleasure to any reader, not only to academic specialists.”

Joseph Harris, Harvard University

“Lincoln has written a magnificently nuanced and immensely scholarly work on the great Norwegian and Icelandic sagas concerning the origins of the ancient Norwegian state and its unification by Harald Fairhair, also known as ’the Shaggy.’ He brilliantly demonstrates the poetic, virtually ontological, and reverberating potency of the sagas, and their role in the forging of political legitimacy in a historical context where monarchic forces contend against those that imagine a state that rejects the submission that monarchical power demands. This is a study that realizes the great literary and narrative genius of the sagas, filled with anthropological insight, and relevance for contemporary discussions of the nature of the state and its hold over the peoples it commands.”

Bruce Kapferer, author of Legends of People, Myths of State