Living with Moral Disagreement
The Enduring Controversy about Affirmative Action
9780226344386
9780226344249
9780226344416
Living with Moral Disagreement
The Enduring Controversy about Affirmative Action
How to handle affirmative action is one of the most intractable policy problems of our era, touching on controversial issues such as race-consciousness and social justice. Much has been written both for and against affirmative action policies—especially within the realm of educational opportunity. In this book, philosopher Michele S. Moses offers a crucial new pathway for thinking about the debate surrounding educational affirmative action, one that holds up the debate itself as an important emblem of the democratic process.
Central to Moses’s analysis is the argument that we need to understand disagreements about affirmative action as inherently moral, products of conflicts between deeply held beliefs that shape differing opinions on what justice requires of education policy. As she shows, differing opinions on affirmative action result from different conceptual values, for instance, between being treated equally and being treated as an equal or between seeing race-consciousness as a pernicious political force or as a necessary variable in political equality. As Moses shows, although moral disagreements about race-conscious policies and similar issues are often seen as symptoms of dysfunctional politics, they in fact create rich opportunities for discussions about diversity that nourish democratic thought and life.
Central to Moses’s analysis is the argument that we need to understand disagreements about affirmative action as inherently moral, products of conflicts between deeply held beliefs that shape differing opinions on what justice requires of education policy. As she shows, differing opinions on affirmative action result from different conceptual values, for instance, between being treated equally and being treated as an equal or between seeing race-consciousness as a pernicious political force or as a necessary variable in political equality. As Moses shows, although moral disagreements about race-conscious policies and similar issues are often seen as symptoms of dysfunctional politics, they in fact create rich opportunities for discussions about diversity that nourish democratic thought and life.
144 pages | 2 tables | 6 x 9 | © 2016
Education: Education--Economics, Law, Politics, Higher Education, Philosophy of Education
Philosophy: Ethics
Political Science: Public Policy
Reviews
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
One / “Who Isn’t for Equality?”
Two / The Case of Affirmative Action Policy
Three / The Nature of Moral Disagreement: Conflicting Ideals?
Four / Ballot Initiatives, Moral Disagreement, and Ideas of Equality
Five / Deliberative Democracy and Policy Dialogue (with Lauren P. Saenz and Amy Farley Lobue)
Six / What Should We Do about Profound Moral Disagreements over Education Policy?
Appendix A / Pre-Questionnaire
Appendix B / Post-Questionnaire
Appendix C / Post-Post-Questionnaire
Appendix D / Follow-Up Interview Protocol
Notes
References
Index
One / “Who Isn’t for Equality?”
Two / The Case of Affirmative Action Policy
Three / The Nature of Moral Disagreement: Conflicting Ideals?
Four / Ballot Initiatives, Moral Disagreement, and Ideas of Equality
Five / Deliberative Democracy and Policy Dialogue (with Lauren P. Saenz and Amy Farley Lobue)
Six / What Should We Do about Profound Moral Disagreements over Education Policy?
Appendix A / Pre-Questionnaire
Appendix B / Post-Questionnaire
Appendix C / Post-Post-Questionnaire
Appendix D / Follow-Up Interview Protocol
Notes
References
Index
Be the first to know
Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!